Pamela Anderson’s Evolving Makeup Looks Over the Years Highlight Her Iconic Status

Pamela Anderson told Glamour magazine, “I realized as a very young child, I was playing roles my whole life.” In 1985, at age 17, the role in question was small-town student, volleyball player, girl-next-door with a far-off look in her eye.

In her Highland Secondary yearbook portrait, she wore barely a trace of makeup. Her brows are full, her brunette hair softly feathered. There is maybe a touch of lip product and a sweep of blush, but the pizzazz is still years away.

By 1990, any residual traces of naturalism had been thoroughly replaced by a look engineered for a specific cultural framework. Anderson had appeared on her first Playboy cover the year before and was named Playmate of the Month in February.

Here, Anderson’s face had been totally rendered in the grammar of Playboy’s house style. Her platinum hair fell in unruly waves, designed to look glamorously spontaneous but clearly arranged for effect. The makeup was anything but subtle. Her eyes were outlined in a thick band of black. Mascara hardened the lashes stiff, and the brows plucked into narrow arches (a questionable classic among ’90s beauty trends).

Her lips were overlined and glossed. The skin, bronzed and evenly lit, gave her an almost airbrushed ideal. This look would endure as a glyph of the time’s mass-mediated femininity. We would see its purest expressions in Anderson’s performances on “Baywatch” and in “Barb Wire.”

A decade on, the bombshell had received its millennium-era remaster of the familiar fantasy. Pictured here at Duvet in Manhattan in 2005, she offered the same exaggerated silhouette, just refracted through the aesthetics of early reality television and red carpet maximalism. If the ’90s face was built for magazine covers, the 2005 version felt made for flash photography and bottle service.

Her beauty look pulled no punches. Her eyes were glazed in a dark metallic shadow, diffused outward in a heavy, deliberate haze. Gone were the muted brown lipsticks of the ’90s, traded as they were for a saccharine pink that became emblematic of Y2K decadence. The brow du jour was untouched by shifting trends, and they remained as they had always been on Pammy: still thin, still arched, and still suspended high above the lid.

The 2010s introduced a different iteration of Pamela Anderson. Her once-peroxide waves had mellowed into a cooler champagne blonde, cut into a chic bob with understated mid-century echoes. It raised the question: was she shifting her reference point from sex symbol to screen siren?

The makeup told a similar story. Her complexion looked luminous, and felt more refreshed than the high-gloss days of her youth. She’d also learned how to fill out sparse brows, as hers had relaxed just a tad from their severe state.

This was a transitional phase for Anderson. The overt symbols of her Baywatch years had been pulled back. The dial on her full glam had been turned down — deliberately, presciently, and little rebelliously — at a time when beauty was accelerating in the opposite direction, with contour kits, strobing tutorials, and the rise of the Instagram face. Stripping things back as the rest of us were still baking to cringeworthy oblivion, and for perhaps the first time, the gaze felt less performative.

Pamela Anderson’s latest evolution — the no-makeup age of the 2020s — seems her most personal. The 2025 Golden Globes was one of her most striking examples. After the death of her longtime makeup artist, Alexis Vogel, from breast cancer, she stepped away from cosmetics entirely. “She was the best,” Anderson told Elle, “and since then, I just felt, without Alexis, it’s just better for me not to wear makeup.”

In so doing, Anderson joins a growing cohort of older celebs that aren’t playing by society’s beauty rules. “I feel rooted for. I feel good. I’m in a good place,” she said of her decision. And for that, she remains an icon.